The Judgment of leaders Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

The belief of leadership - Assignment ExampleBoth the internal and external societal contexts also plays a study role where organizations notably the incorporated world and civil leaders argon increasingly fragmented, and acknowledging equivocal and this has resulted into readjustment and change in various conventional concepts in regard to followinghip and leadership. The key specific conventional factors allow the rise of organizational crisis, ethical issues, social issues, motivation effects and corporate scandals. These factors have created uneasiness, leadership in demand(p) and inadequacies and emphasis on the search of meaning. Therefore the practical challenges underlying leadership as a short letter and social practice has elicited various vista of judgment from the followers. These conventional perspectives are notably touch on on the followers thus taking person-centered thus the underlying judgment rely on stereotyping and idealistic leadership. Thus the judg mental influence of the followers is unidirectional flowing from the leaders to their followers representing specific perspective which reconstructs the hierarchical subject-object relations. The leader follower relationship represents widely the interactions and mechanisms between the independent individuals. Followership and its judgmental on the leadership are authoritative because the latter cannot exist without the other. Therefore it is important to determine the leader-centric focus and how the followers try and understanding interdependence of leadership and its active fellowship. The bottom line on how followers judge leaders is how leadership is shared and the leaders judgment on his or her followers. Leader-Follower centrality Relational qualities uniting leadership-followership notably have significant influence on Followership judgment on their leaders. This begins with the leadership perception to his or her relation followers and to himself. This forms the foundatio n in which the followers judge the leaders because the self other perception influences greatly the followers perception. Notably in regard to this are the followers judgments that favor leaders military unit and authority over them. This is common where the followers exhibit dominant motif and in this case the followers look compliant and can be easily manipulated even at the extreme ends (Oddenino, 2003). In organizations and corporate world subordinates within dominance motif feel abused but they cannot do anything. The managers and CEOs say that leadership is when pain inflicted is demonstrated for effectiveness to be achieved. The subordinates within dominance motif judge their supervisors and managers with the assumption of joint dependency idea in their organizations as well as the value of maintaining personal dignity (Weibler, 2011). The subordinates are cowed in their judgments therefore leaders are likely to get deprived of accurate and honesty information. This fuels s elf-absorption and self-deception resulting in the fall of arbitrary power. GROUPTHINK According to Ladkin (2010) in his study on organizational leadership provides that Groupthink is adopt by most followers in judging their leaders. This is where there agreement and consensus is far much important than the solution, in this case followers adopt possible alternative courses of action in their judgments (Ladkin, 2010). This is common in organizations and